Articles

Nikon vs Canon?

In the internet and in real life, there are constant discussions, fights about which is better: Canon or Nikon, but what about Pentax and Olympus? I will reveal the truth about which is better.

Introduction

Just like the constant fight happens between BMW and Mercedes car owners, it also happens between Canon and Nikon photographers. Just like Audi, Ford, etc. get in between, Pentax and Olympus owners interfere in photo discussions. And so you can find equally comparable things in many other industries: PC vs MAC, woman vs man, strength vs tenderness, etc. And now more specifically about photos.
If we look at professional photographers who shoot with 35mm format, then you will see that 98% of them are Canonists and Nikonists. When shooting sports or reportage, and seeing Latvian professional photographers next to you, no one has ever seen Olympus, Pentax, Sigma, Kodak, or any other beasts. Only and exclusively Canons or Nikons. When we look at the Olympic Games and see photographers standing in a row - only Canon and Nikon. With this I want to say that Canon and Nikon in my and others' understanding are professional cameras, because they have respective service, support, stability, product range. But Pentax, Olympus, etc. are amateur cameras. Of course, a time may come when next to a Canonist and Nikonist at the world Olympics, a Pentaxist will sit with a decent backpack on a monopod and right next to him an Olympus fan will change their bright lenses, but well, that requires time. So let's continue talking only about Canon and Nikon.

Which is Better?

Which is better? Actually, there is no single best. There is no and will be no winner in this fight, because each of these brands will find its buyer.
Both manufacturers have equally similar cameras both in parameters and in price, only with minor differences, because each has its own pluses and minuses, and we already know well that there is no perfect in the world, only a striving for it. But as it turns out, Canon's and Nikon's ideal is still a bit different.

Differences

Let's talk further about each brand's minuses and pluses. When talking about minuses, they are not so fatal that you need to reject a brand, I count them among unpleasant minor things that will improve over time. Often all the pluses of a camera can be obscured by something like the camera not being comfortable in hand, or some other minor thing that for you personally can be the biggest plus or minus.

Used equipment. One of Canon's pluses is their popularity. Therefore, you can much more easily purchase used Canon lenses. If you've bought a new L lens, then because of popularity many will ask to test it. For Nikonists, giving and testing is more peaceful.

Lenses.
Canon's lens lineup is certainly more impressive and wider. Lenses like 24mm f/1.4, 35mm f/1.4 are available, whereas the legendary Nikon 28mm f/1.4 has been discontinued. Canon has lenses with f/1.2 and f/1.0, whereas Nikon only has manual lenses of this type. However, many believe that Nikon lens quality is slightly better, as people say "the lens draws more pleasantly" (Nikon is the leading leader in microscope production even surpassing Zeiss and Leitz, which only indicates their lens manufacturing experience). Nikon delights with their mid-range lens 85mm f/1.4, but Canon offers either the cheap 85mm f/1.8 or the expensive 85mm f/1.2. The biggest Nikon plus is that you can put old Nikon lenses on any Nikon camera, and their quality very often exceeds modern autofocus lenses. You can view many lenses here for Nikon and Canon.

Functionality.
Same category and price models are more functional for Nikon than Canon. Additional features and capabilities are added that create additional convenience compared to Canon models. This can be well seen by comparing models at www.dpreview.com. Nikon has a more functional flash system compared to Canon (Wireless System, Commander mode).

Comfort.
Nikon beats Canon in control. Even Canonists say that to get to know Nikon, one day is enough, because all buttons are in understandable places and you can intuitively understand where everything is, but to get to know Canon (because more pro series cameras) more time is needed. If a person has never held either Nikon or Canon in hand, they will master the Nikon camera faster, because it has better and more understandable navigation and usage. Nikon has no two-button combination options.

Politics.
The pursuit of profit and increasing the number of sold cameras has ruined Canon. Nikon respects buyer interests more than Canon. This is noticed in very many things, for example, Nikon SB-800 flash comes with color temperature adjustment filters, additional battery compartment, where Canon users have to look for it somewhere. Not infrequently, Canon releases a camera that soon turns out to be defective and newly baked cameras have to be sent back, whereas Nikon tests their cameras very long before releasing to market.

Cameras
. Some will say that Nikon doesn't have a studio camera (high megapixel camera). In the nearest half year, Nikon D3x will be released, which is more intended for studio work, not photojournalism like Nikon D3. Many were surprised by Nikon D3. Soon the Canon 6D camera will also be released from Canon, which will be able to compete with D3. This just proves that Nikon and Canon go step by step and delight buyers with same class cameras with minor differences.

Conclusion

When you can't choose a camera for various reasons, I recommend simply going to a store and holding various cameras in hand. You will be able to conclude that some of them are not meant for your hand. Don't delve too much into tests, don't waste time on unnecessary comparisons and tests, buy faster and start shooting. You can't choose wrong, because cameras in the same price segment will give very similar results. And most importantly remember - it's not the camera that makes the photo, but the photographer! The camera is just a tool, like a painter has a brush in hand... And none of the painters spend several days debating in forums about which manufacturer's brush to buy.


Comments

7.andreart  2014-12-11 12:39:52
Very interesting video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jva08HY6uLE
6.fatals  2008-05-03 03:26:54
Thanks for the article, I did not know about the lens difference, it really makes me think about which one to buy next... I had been planning to buy a Canon 1 Mark III, but now I have to start thinking... Need to research more...:) At the moment I myself have a Canon D40 and I am quite satisfied...;) I think that all of this really goes into the same pot, and neither one nor the other will ever be the leader, at least not in the near future...;)
5.Martins  2008-03-28 11:05:59
It is supposedly a camera comparison... but in reality it is justifying why still NIKON... :)!!!
4.Fuzzy  2008-03-22 14:22:27
Similar statements a few years ago were made by <a href=http://reinistraidas.lv/>Reinis</a>. Only not so broadly.

A more picky person could easily argue against your arguments, but I myself have also come to like Nikons more... even because of the small design nuances (which are basically quite insignificant).
3.LatFoto  2008-03-22 10:13:22
Well, that is approximately how it is ;-). I did not understand anything about politics though, but maybe it seems that way to someone.
2.Raish  2008-03-22 01:49:22
I will quote myself from the pods.lv comments.

Seven years ago everyone was shooting with Nikons, and now they will shoot with them again, that is clear. Just like any other kind of tech brand mania has cycles, cameras do too. For example, if someone now says AMD processors are better, then he is either conservative or looking to the future, but it has nothing to do with the real situation. I have been loyal to Nikon for three years already, although when this hobby started for me it was Canon time, but my dream about Nikon began seven years ago, when they were on top. This story can be compared to the fight between BMW and Mercedes in America, where for a while AUDI tries to squeeze in between, another time Lexus, aka Olympus, earlier Kodak, now possibly SONY. And all of you/we forget one thing - the investors and shareholders of these companies are the same people/companies, and the real battle is over the consumer who is constantly reaching for an alternative or an alternative to the alternative (- - = +). If there were one product in the market, none of these groups would be interested in it. If Nikon and Canon merged into one company, then surely they would crush all competitors like little flies. But then people would start looking for an alternative. These companies would lose a huge market share. Do you think Apple and Microsoft really compete that much? Yes, they compete. But these companies do not really care which product gets bought, because the whole hook lies in patents/chip suppliers/stock tickers and the spiral. Usually after such a stream of thoughts you just want to tell everyone to go to hell and buy a LOMO, but somebody makes that crap too and somebody owns it and you throw money into the common pot :)
1.Papuass  2008-03-22 00:39:38
I myself use an entry-level Canon D400. The biggest minus is the grip. Small Japanese hands? I am also a little jealous of the relatively low price of the Nikon 70-200 F2.8. Canon users have to spend more for it. Overall I agree with the article, it is well written, even though you can feel the touch of a Nikon fan :)

Name*
Email* (email will not be published)
Website
Comment*
Links are not allowed in comments
What is five plus zero = * (in words)