TIO Photo Shock

Riga Piena Kombinats held a TIO photoshot event, during which I was chosen as the photographer for this event.

Event

During the TIO photoshot event, visitors could ask themselves questions about photography, and I had to provide answers to these questions. Thank God there weren't 1000 questions, but only a few, for which I could provide exhaustive answers.

Thanks to the Base team and Riga Piena Kombinats!!!
 

Questions

You learned photo processing yourself - by experimenting or also by attending courses? And what programs do you yourself use, if you may know?

Yes, I learned everything by experimenting with my own photos and learning from resources available on the internet. I recommend using google.com and searching for the topic of interest with the keyword "tutorials" (for example, "photoshop tutorials"). This way you can find very many tutorials.
I myself mostly use Adobe Lightroom and sometimes Adobe Photoshop programs.

Hello. I have a Canon Powershot G9. I would like to know why photos look brighter in the camera, but when loaded to the computer they don't look as bright, pale. And what is RAW size?

From how you see photos on the computer, it depends on both the monitor and computer settings. Try borrowing another monitor from a friend to understand if the problem is with your monitor. If another monitor shows the same, then the problem is in the system or browsing program. It's recommended to try viewing photos with a different program, or do monitor calibration with professionals.
RAW is not a size, but a photo storage mode. There are several - JPG, TIFF, RAW and others (depending on the camera model). RAW format contains much more information about the image than JPG, therefore it takes up much more space on your memory card. This mode is mostly used by people who later process photos with graphics programs, to manipulate as much as possible with the stored information about the image. If you shoot family and friend photos, use JPG format instead.

Which camera is better - Nikon or Canon?

Just like the constant fight happens between BMW and Mercedes car owners, it also happens between Canon and Nikon photographers. Just like Audi, Ford, etc. get in between, Pentax and Olympus owners interfere in photo discussions. And so you can find equally comparable things in many other industries: PC vs MAC, woman vs man, strength vs tenderness, etc. And now more specifically about photos.
If we look at professional photographers who shoot with 35mm format, then you will see that 98% of them are Canonists and Nikonists. When shooting sports or reportage, and seeing Latvian professional photographers next to you, no one has ever seen Olympus, Pentax, Sigma, Kodak, or any other beasts. Only and exclusively Canons or Nikons. When we look at the Olympic Games and see photographers standing in a row - only Canon and Nikon. With this I want to say that Canon and Nikon in my and others' understanding are professional cameras, because they have respective service, support, stability, product range. But Pentax, Olympus, etc. are amateur cameras. Of course, a time may come when next to a Canonist and Nikonist at the world Olympics, a Pentaxist will sit with a decent backpack on a monopod and right next to him an Olympus fan will change their bright lenses, but well, that requires time. Therefore let's continue talking only about Canon and Nikon.

Which is better? Actually, there is no single best. There is no and will be no winner in this fight, because each of these brands will find its buyer.
Both manufacturers have equally similar cameras both in parameters and in price, only with minor differences, because each has its own pluses and minuses, and we already know well that there is no perfect in the world, only a striving for it. But as it turns out, Canon's and Nikon's ideal is still a bit different.

Let's talk further about each brand's minuses and pluses. When talking about minuses, they are not so fatal that you need to reject a brand, I count them among unpleasant minor things that will improve over time. Often all the pluses of a camera can be obscured by something like the camera not being comfortable in hand, or some other minor thing that for you personally can be the biggest plus or minus.

One of Canon's pluses is their popularity. Therefore, you can much more easily purchase used Canon lenses. If you've bought a new L lens, then because of popularity many will ask to test it. For Nikonists, giving and testing is more peaceful.

Canon's lens lineup is certainly more impressive and wider. Lenses like 24mm f/1.4, 35mm f/1.4 are available, whereas the legendary Nikon 28mm f/1.4 has been discontinued. Canon has lenses with f/1.2 and f/1.0, whereas Nikon only has manual lenses of this type. However, many believe that Nikon lens quality is slightly better, as people say "the lens draws more pleasantly" (Nikon is the leading leader in microscope production even surpassing Zeiss and Leitz, which only indicates their lens manufacturing experience). Nikon delights with their mid-range lens 85mm f/1.4, but Canon offers either the cheap 85mm f/1.8 or the expensive 85mm f/1.2. The biggest Nikon plus is that you can put old Nikon lenses on any Nikon camera, and their quality very often exceeds modern autofocus lenses. Here you can view many lenses for Nikon and Canon.

Same category and price models are more functional for Nikon than Canon. Additional features and capabilities are added that create additional convenience compared to Canon models. This can be well seen by comparing models at www.dpreview.com. Nikon has a more functional flash system compared to Canon (Wireless System, Commander mode).

Nikon beats Canon in control. Even Canonists say that to get to know Nikon, one day is enough, because all buttons are in understandable places and you can intuitively understand where everything is, but to get to know Canon (because more pro series cameras) more time is needed. If a person has never held either Nikon or Canon in hand, they will master the Nikon camera faster, because it has better and more understandable navigation and usage. Nikon has no two-button combination options.

The pursuit of profit and increasing the number of sold cameras has ruined Canon. Nikon respects buyer interests more than Canon. This is noticed in very many things, for example, Nikon SB-800 flash comes with color temperature adjustment filters, additional battery compartment, where Canon users have to look for it somewhere. Not infrequently, Canon releases a camera that soon turns out to be defective and newly baked cameras have to be sent back, whereas Nikon tests their cameras very long before releasing to market.

Some will say that Nikon doesn't have a studio camera (high megapixel camera). In the nearest half year, Nikon D3x will be released, which is more intended for studio work, not photojournalism like Nikon D3. Many were surprised by Nikon D3. Soon the Canon 6D camera will also be released from Canon, which will be able to compete with D3. This just proves that Nikon and Canon go step by step and delight buyers with same class cameras with minor differences.

When you can't choose a camera for various reasons, I recommend simply going to a store and holding various cameras in hand. You will be able to conclude that some of them are not meant for your hand. Don't delve too much into tests, don't waste time on unnecessary comparisons and tests, buy faster and start shooting. You can't choose wrong, because cameras in the same price segment will give very similar results. And most importantly remember - it's not the camera that makes the photo, but the photographer - YOU! The camera is just a tool, like a painter has a brush in hand... And none of the painters spend several days debating in forums about which manufacturer's brush to buy.

Good luck with your choice!

Comments